ANALYSIS: Love it or hate it, Messenger is Facebook's most important product.Already, Facebook the social network feels like the clunky backend of the real product, an app where you actually talk to your friends, who barely post anything personal on the site itself any more.
It's
not as splashy as Snapchat, but there's a reason it consistently beats
those apps in engagement and app downloads. Sixty billion messages are sent a
day on Messenger.
Facebook
are turning Messenger into a proper platform - a place where you do a lot more
than just chat to friends.
They
want it to replace phone calls, bill payments, even search engines - Facebook
want to make Messenger the way you access and modify the entire modern world.
It
may sound ambitious, but it isn't exactly new.
I'm
based in Shanghai right now, and whenever I meet
a new person they immediately ask to add me on WeChat, a messaging app that is
completely dominant in China (Facebook
is banned here, something Mark Zuckerberg is desperately trying to change).
WeChat
already does all the things Facebook messenger wants to do. You can buy pretty
much anything you want through WeChat. You can pay your bills through it, or
order a pizza, or repairs for your internet connection. You can even call
the police.
Of
course, none of these things are impossible to do with your smartphone now. The
difference is the interface.
Instead
of calling an 0800 number and waiting on hold for 10-20 minutes or trying to
remember the password to a complicated website built in 2007, you just message
someone - or something.
Yes,
the only way this kind of thing can upscale is if the person on the other end
of the chat is actually a "bot" - a pile of computer code that is
smart enough to respond to you as if it was a person.
Facebook
is opening up Messenger for others to develop their own bots within.
Think
Siri, but actually good. Think Slackbot, the insanely useful personal assistant
built in to Slack. ThinkForbesBot, one of a bevy of new chatbots from media
companies wanting to serve you a very personal diet of news.
At
F8, Zuckerberg was effusive in his love for bots, and his hate for calling
people on the phone.
"I've
never met anyone who likes calling businesses," he said, whereas, "I
think advances in AI (artificial intelligence) can help save peoples
lives."
But
don't assume that you'll always be chatting to a pile of code. Facebook have
been working on a personal assistant called "M" in
extremely private beta for a few years now.
The
assistant can do almost anything for you - book flights, order flowers, your
taxes - but it isn't always a bot, occasionally a human
"augments" the process.
It
isn't hard to understand the allure of chatbots. They offer all the
automative benefits of a self-driving car with none of the "physics is
really hard" pitfalls.
Furthermore,
through search engines, video games, and command lines, we've become quite
good at talking to computers in a way they understand. (I don't want to give
the impression that bot-making is without risks. Exhibit
A,exhibit
B. We've been trying to get this right for like two decades.)
It's
even easier to understand why Facebook want in on this. When you control the
platform you control the rules. WeChat makes a lot of money by controlling
"WeChat Wallet," the payment system within their app.
Change
at this level is difficult. Thousands of vulnerable people are are employed in
call centres in New Zealand .
They aren't going to be replaced by Facebook chatbots tomorrow, but as we look
forward to a future without hold times, it's always helpful to keep the humans
whose lives we might change in mind.


No comments:
Post a Comment